Identifying and evaluating the critical success factors of self-regulation policies in Iranian cinema

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Media Management, Aras Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate of Prof, in Department of Media Management, and Business Communications, Faculty of Business, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate of Prof, in Institute for Society and Information Research, Iran Institute of Information Science and Technology (Irandoc), Tehran, Iran

Abstract
The lack of implementation of self-regulatory policies has led to a lack of flexibility and coordination between regulatory institutions and filmmakers, and to structural problems in the development process of the Iranian cinema market. The aim of this research is to identify and evaluate critical factors for the success of self-regulatory policies in the Iranian cinema industry. To achieve this goal, the critical factors for the success of self-regulatory policies have been identified and evaluated the main obstacles to implementing these policies in Iranian cinema, analyzing the existing and desired conditions
Method: The mixed quantitative and qualitative method were used. In order to outline the desired conditions and identify the critical factors for the success of self-regulatory policies, relying on theoretical foundations, we have compared and quantitatively ranked the most important factors in three industrial, strategic, and environmental indicators. Then, qualitative data and expert opinions have been used to evaluate the existing conditions of Iranian cinema and assess the obstacles and challenges. Quantitative data was collected through paired comparison questionnaires and qualitative data through targeted interviews. Quantitative data was also analyzed in Expert Choice software and qualitative data was analyzed by coding.
Findings: According to the research findings, the factors related to the strategic index in quantitative data with a total rank of 3528 and 46 percent and in qualitative data with a total of 90 , are the most important gap between the current and desired conditions in Iranian cinema. in order to remove the obstacles to implementing self-regulatory policies in Iranian cinema, strengthening factors such as expanding privatization, establishing film councils and increasing the autonomy of cinema professions, investing in talents and human resources is recommended.
Conclusion: Based on the data obtained, four factors are considered the most important solutions for implementing self-regulation policies in Iranian cinema: striking a balance between government and private regulation, expanding privatization and new technology, and paying attention to international capacities.

Keywords

Subjects

Gholampour Ahangar, E. (2011). The Relationship Between Policymakers And Cinematographers In Policy-Making For Iranian Cinema. Journal Of Strategic Studies Of Public Policy-Making, Volume 11, Issue 41.
Majlis Research Center (2011), Regulations Of The Supreme Council Of Cinema.
Moradi, H. & Karimi, M. (2019). A Study Of Self-Regulatory Policies In Iranian Media. Journal Of Cultural Policy, 12 (4), 45-62.
Moreshtz, P.; Karmasin, M. & Taishman, R. (2010). How Do Governments Help Cinema? Strategies For Financing, Cultural Development And Regulation (Selected Articles), Translated By Amir Salehi, F. & Esfandiari, Sh. Tehran: Iranian Artists' House.
Nafisi, H. (2015). Social History Of Iranian Cinema: Workshop Production Course (1276-1320), Volume 1: Tehran. Gisoom.
Omid, J. (2010), History Of Iranian Cinema. Tehran: Rozaneh.
Sarbandi, F.; Hajiani, E. & Amiri Salehi, R. (2010). Analysis Of Cultural Policies And Performance Of Post-Islamic Revolution Governments In The Field Of Cinema Economy: Media And Culture. Institute For Humanities And Cultural Studies, Issue 1, 101–1.
Tajdini, A. (2019). Policymakers Of Post-Islamic Revolution Cinema. Tehran: Institute For Humanities And Cultural Studies, Issue 19
Gholampour Ahangar, E. (2011). The Relationship Between Policymakers And Cinematographers In Policy-Making For Iranian Cinema. Journal Of Strategic Studies Of Public Policy-Making, Volume 11, Issue 41.
Majlis Research Center (2011), Regulations Of The Supreme Council Of Cinema.
Moradi, H. & Karimi, M. (2019). A Study Of Self-Regulatory Policies In Iranian Media. Journal Of Cultural Policy, 12 (4), 45-62.
Moreshtz, P.; Karmasin, M. & Taishman, R. (2010). How Do Governments Help Cinema? Strategies For Financing, Cultural Development And Regulation (Selected Articles), Translated By Amir Salehi, F. & Esfandiari, Sh. Tehran: Iranian Artists' House.
Nafisi, H. (2015). Social History Of Iranian Cinema: Workshop Production Course (1276-1320), Volume 1: Tehran. Gisoom.
Omid, J. (2010), History Of Iranian Cinema. Tehran: Rozaneh.
Sarbandi, F.; Hajiani, E. & Amiri Salehi, R. (2010). Analysis Of Cultural Policies And Performance Of Post-Islamic Revolution Governments In The Field Of Cinema Economy: Media And Culture. Institute For Humanities And Cultural Studies, Issue 1, 101–1.
Tajdini, A. (2019). Policymakers Of Post-Islamic Revolution Cinema. Tehran: Institute For Humanities And Cultural Studies, Issue 19
Gholampour Ahangar, E. (2011). The Relationship Between Policymakers And Cinematographers In Policy-Making For Iranian Cinema. Journal Of Strategic Studies Of Public Policy-Making, Volume 11, Issue 41.
Majlis Research Center (2011), Regulations Of The Supreme Council Of Cinema.
Moradi, H. & Karimi, M. (2019). A Study Of Self-Regulatory Policies In Iranian Media. Journal Of Cultural Policy, 12 (4), 45-62.
Moreshtz, P.; Karmasin, M. & Taishman, R. (2010). How Do Governments Help Cinema? Strategies For Financing, Cultural Development And Regulation (Selected Articles), Translated By Amir Salehi, F. & Esfandiari, Sh. Tehran: Iranian Artists' House.
Nafisi, H. (2015). Social History Of Iranian Cinema: Workshop Production Course (1276-1320), Volume 1: Tehran. Gisoom.
Omid, J. (2010), History Of Iranian Cinema. Tehran: Rozaneh.
Sarbandi, F.; Hajiani, E. & Amiri Salehi, R. (2010). Analysis Of Cultural Policies And Performance Of Post-Islamic Revolution Governments In The Field Of Cinema Economy: Media And Culture. Institute For Humanities And Cultural Studies, Issue 1, 101–1.
Tajdini, A. (2019). Policymakers Of Post-Islamic Revolution Cinema. Tehran: Institute For Humanities And Cultural Studies, Issue 19
Alsagoff, Syed Agil Shekh. (2016). Self-regulation practices in Malaysian media. Thesis Book.
Baldwin, Robert., Cave, Martin., & C Lodge, Martin. (2013). Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. ISBN: 9780199576081. DOI:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199576081.001.0001.
Berkowitz, Heloise., & Souchaud, Antoine. (2019). (Self)-regulation of sharing economy platforms through partial meta-organizing. Journal of Business Ethics,159(4). DOI:10.1007/s10551-019-04206-8.
Brown, K., & Taylor, P. (2019). Trust and transparency in self-regulatory frameworks. Cultural Policy Review, 10 (1), 47-68.
Etteldorf, Christina. (2022). [DE] New german film support act enters into force on1. IRIS Merlin.
Freedman, Des., Henten, Anders., Towse, Ruth., & Wallis, Roger. (2008). The impact of the internet on media policy, regulation and copyright law. In book: The internet and the mass media,102-124. DOI:10.4135/9781446216316.n6
Hartlapp, Miriam. (2020). Measuring and comparing the regulatory welfare state: Social objectives in public procuremen, ANNALS, AAPSS, 691, DOI: 10.1177/0002716220952060.
Jones, M., & Harris, L. (2017). Media regulation in europe: a comparative study of self-regulatory practices. European Journal of Communication, 22(4), 56-74.
Kang, Hyewon., & Yin,W.(2022). The competitive advantage of the indian and korean film industries: an empirical analysis using natural language processing methods. Applied sciences, 12(9), 4592, https://DOI.org/10.3390/app12094592.
Kim, Y., Park, S., & Choi, J. (2021). Challenges in adopting self-regulation in developing media markets. Asian Journal of Media Studies, 9(1), 67-82.
Lampe, Ryan., & McRae, S. (2020). Self-regulation vs state regulation: Evidence from cinema age restrictions. Electronic copy available at: from retrieved, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3128622.
Latzer, Michae., & Saurwein, Florian. (2010). Regulatory choice in communications: The case of content-rating schemes in the audiovisual industry. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(3),463-484.DOI:10.1080/08838151.2010.498846
Murschetz, Paul., Teichmann, R., & Karmasin, M.(2018). Handbook of state aid for film finance, industries and regulation why study state aid for film? A necessary clarification. Media business and innovation, 13.
Nisbet, Erik., Dal, Aysenur. (2022). Walking through firewalls: circumventing censorship of social media and online content in a networked authoritarian context. Social Media Society, 8(4),205630512211377.DOI:10.1177/20563051221137738
Puppis, Manuel.(2010). Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique.
Radu, Mîrza.(2021). Regulation and self-regulation: Two pieces of the puzzle for a healthy media landscape in moldova. Media forward, 15.
Senden, L.A.J., Hiemstra, E. Kica M., & Klinger, LL.M & K. (2015). Mapping self- and co-regulation approaches in the eu context. MA Utrecht University.
Smith, J., Johnson, A., & Miller, D. (2020). Self-regulation policies in global media industries. Journal of Media Studies, 15(3), 203-218.
Su, Yuan., & Yang, Z.(2021). Analysis on the evolution of china’s cultural industry policy from perspective of advocacy coalition framework. Advances in Social Science, Education and humanities research, 635.
Thompson, R. (2016). The role of mpaa in american film regulation. Journal of Cultural Analysis, 8(2), 112-125.
Thussu, Daya.(2017). The soft power of popular cinema – the case of India. Journal of Political Power, 9 (3), 415-429.
https://DOI.org/10.1080/2158379X.2016.1232288.
Zhu, Ying., & Rosen, S.(2010). Art, politics, and commerce in chinese cinema. Hong Kong University Press, from Retrieved :www.hkupress.org.
 
 
 

  • Receive Date 22 August 2024
  • Revise Date 05 January 2025
  • Accept Date 19 January 2025